IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2012, 11:30 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Official 2012 NFL Draft Round 2-3 Thread

...the search for Jacoby's replacement continues...
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2012, 01:03 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

I'm seeing one of following for us in the 2nd:
Sanu - WR - Rutgers
Quick - WR - App St.
Massie - OT - Ole Piss
Adams - OT - OH St.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2012, 01:04 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Hill has the measureables but my gut tells me Randle is going to be a better all-around WR and is a better fit for this team. I'm hoping they can somehow snag him, but they'll have to move up to get him. No way I wanted Fleener at #26, but he'd be intriguing in this offense and I might move up a few picks to get him if he starts to drop. I have a feeling he'll go to the Colts, though, since he's Luck's buddy and they have zero legit TE's on roster. If it's WR, I assume Jeffery, Sanu and Quick will all be there. Massie is intriguing. I don't think they touch Adams.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2012, 01:31 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

You could be entirely wrong about Hill. I think he will be a monster in a year or so. Randle may do well also.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2012, 01:42 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
You could be entirely wrong about Hill. I think he will be a monster in a year or so. Randle may do well also.
Never said Hill will be a bust. I like him and he may very well have a nice career. I just think that Hill will be a straight-line speed threat, whereas, Randle will be a better all-around (blocking, slot, middle and deep) threat and fits better with what this team needs from a #2. JMHO. It's sort of the Mike Wallace vs. Antonio Brown syndrome. They're both great players, and one team might prefer Wallace's straight-line speed and another team might prefer Brown's all-around style. I think the Texans need a Brown-type WR as opposed to a Wallace-type WR (atlthough, I'll take anything to upgrade what we have now).

Last edited by popanot; 04-27-2012 at 01:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2012, 04:42 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

I'm listening to 610 AM radio right now and FWIW John McClain, a guest on the show, just said very confidantly that the Texans WOULD NOT take a WR UNTIL the 3rd round. I for one will be surprised if that scenario plays out, but we'll see?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2012, 05:03 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

I think I'd go CB or OL if Round 2 went this way:

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...nd-mock-draft/

I'd probably take Trumaine Johnson or Josh Robinson over Sanu.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-02-2012, 03:02 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
Never said Hill will be a bust. I like him and he may very well have a nice career. I just think that Hill will be a straight-line speed threat, whereas, Randle will be a better all-around (blocking, slot, middle and deep) threat and fits better with what this team needs from a #2. JMHO. It's sort of the Mike Wallace vs. Antonio Brown syndrome. They're both great players, and one team might prefer Wallace's straight-line speed and another team might prefer Brown's all-around style. I think the Texans need a Brown-type WR as opposed to a Wallace-type WR (atlthough, I'll take anything to upgrade what we have now).
Let's not get caught up in semantics here. I didn't say you thought Hill would be a bust, only that Hill would be a better Pro. I just think you are wrong on that score.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!

Last edited by NBT; 05-03-2012 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2012, 03:48 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Let's not get caught up in seantics here. I didn't say you thought Hill would be a bust, only that Randle would be a better Pro. I just think you are wrong on that score.
Yeah, I see that. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.