Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob
We're not an expansion team any more. If we wound up with all those threes, we should package some of them to move back up for the exact player we want or for picks in 2010. You don't hold that many cards in your hand and wait for the guys you want to come to you. You look at who is the one you want most and then you move to get him.
|
I generally agree with what you're saying. However, this year's draft is so freakin' good in the middle rounds and so weak in the 1st. That being said, if you have a reasonably talented team then it's fairly unrealistic to bring in that many rookies- there just aren't enough spots for them, in theory. That being said, with the depth of this draft and weakness at the top, I would probably rather choose 2 LBs (for instance) in the 3rd round and have an open competition in camp rather than trade up or stay at #15 in order to pick my top LB. I just really can't see any real talent dropoff from a player available at #12 to a player at #112.
Take RB, for instance: I think I'd rather have Moreno than Jennings or Shonn Greene but I'm not really sure why or if it's prudent.