Quote:
Originally Posted by teufelhunden
Hello all I am new to the board and I have been reading this thread in hopes of getting everyones opinion. I am left with a few questions.
How do the candidates that have been mentioned fit with the coaches that we have? What are we going to do with Rhodes, Bush, et.al when we hire these guys?
What hand did the coaches that remain on our staff have in the abysmal defensive performance that we witnessed this year? I know that Bush was the first choice when we hired Smith, What has changed?
I would appreciate anyones insight or opinion.
|
Welcome, Devildog.
My personal opinion is that Rhodes and Bush were simply implementing Smith's game plan. They probably broke down film, looked at tendencies, and coached the players just like most assistants do in the league.
I'm not really sure how much of a hand they had in the "identity" of this defense. Were they making defensive calls? I doubt it.
Now, both coaches are esteemed by Kubiak so they will definitely get the benefit of the doubt. Should they be held accountable? I would have to say yes. Just as should most of the players on the defense.
We don't really need to blow up the entire defense and staff. There are some things we do well. We just need the right leadership to reinforce success and play to our strengths.