View Single Post
  #118  
Old 01-15-2017, 01:37 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
This is so bizarre it's hard to know where to begin. We're talking about the NFL. It's not like Fun Football where the best player on the field can, by sheer force of will, run completely unmolested all over the field. With most routes a receiver is open only momentarily as he comes out of his break or finds a soft spot in the zone or whatever it is. Hence the term NFL open. I know you know this which is why I find it so annoying to be arguing this with you.

Do you ever wonder why Hopkins is better with literally every other Texans quarterback than he is with Brock? More catches, better numbers, etc.? Is it because he simply decides to get open when playing with Savage or Hoyer or Fitzpatrick or whoever? Or is it because Brock Osweiler sucks dick and never fking delivers the ball on time?

The Patriots' receivers weren't usually wide ass open (unless possibly KJ was the guy covering them), it just seems like it because they have the best player in the league as their quarterback and that guy knows when to get the ball to a receiver.

Another thing, if a guy like Belichick decides to take away a certain offensive option there's not much you can do except adapt and rely on other options. John Harris was saying that he listened to the sideline audio from the Pats game earlier in the year and that all game Belichick was yelling TEN!, TEN! Meaning the Texans' number ten is the guy the Pats defense needs to be concerning themselves with. So, two takeaways. One is that one man's mailing it in is another man's getting double and triple teamed. Two is that the best head coach in the history of the mking sport recognizes Deandre Hopkins as the Texans' best (only?) weapon while a bunch of redneck keyboard jockeys sit around bitching about his supposed lack of effort.
Sober Chuck actually made a point here, but in the end he couldn't resist going off the rails. You have again attached not being a big enough fan of Hopkins (or a big enough critic of Osweiller) with being a redneck. Please tell me how one connects to the other.
Reply With Quote