Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck
My overall point has always been unless the team miraculously figures out how to have at least average drafts they will always suck. They wasted Andre's career and I suspect we'll watch them waste JJ's.
|
And I think wasting AJ's career had little to do with the draft and some perceived team wide lack of talent. I think the wasting of JJ's career has little to do with the same.
We have played 5 games and not one of those teams was more talented than us outside of the QB position. Today we lost in OT on the road when their QB was 10Xs better than us. That is not the sign of some talent deficient team.
We are losing because we have no QB. It is a drafting issue because we ignored it in the draft, but we have plenty of secondary depth and OLB production to win if we had a league average QB. We have plenty of everything to win a lot if we had a top 10 QB (Andy Dalton/Tony Romo range). We have enough talent to win a superbowl if we had a truly elite top 3 QB. This roster is no worse than the Ravens team that won 2 years ago or either Giants team, or the Packers team. Flawed teams win the superbowl almost every year. We are a flawed team, but we are good enough to win if we properly address the QB problem (hardest thing to do in football and trying to address it is no guarantee we will).