Thread: The Safeties
View Single Post
  #11  
Old 06-25-2008, 07:47 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jppaul View Post
You know its funny, that is absolutely right. But what the fan base has been begging for for years and never had is a pure centerfielder type of FS.
the perception of that particular need probably changes if our smaller, quicker LB's can cover. LB's that cover who aren't named demeco, i know, i'm still struggling with the concept as well . i'm really looking for diles to step up and maybe adibi as well. if they can step up the coverage and take up more of the field that would give the safeties more air to breathe.

i look at the hybrid safety setup as an extension of two ideals that kind of go against what i think is more traditional defensive setup. 1 LBs who can cover 2 CBs who can support the run stoppage. we've got bigger than average CBs who aren't afraid to get physical and smaller than average LBs who are supposed to be good cover guys.

so the hybrid safeties fill in where needed, as support to run stopping or coverage. each safety equally free and strong. neat idea but i look and see one thing that may cause problems: safety size. perhaps it won't matter at all but i think the body types necessary for the "hybrid" safety is a little bigger than what our starters are. our 3rd string safeties (the brandons) fill that issue perfectly though.
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote