Log in

View Full Version : Titans Will Wear Oilers Uniforms in HoF Game


Keith
02-02-2009, 07:44 AM
...to honor the AFL's 50th anniversary. :rolleyes:

http://www.titansonline.com/news/newsmain_detail.php?PRKey=6592


The Titans will wear their Oilers uniforms of the early 1960s that were distinguished by the derrick logo on their blue helmets. The team played in Houston from 1960-96 before moving to Tennessee.

Buffalo will wear its “throwback” uniforms that feature a simple red buffalo on a white helmet.

The NFL is planning to celebrate the 50th season of its AFL clubs in numerous ways this year.

papabear
02-02-2009, 09:57 AM
This made me throw up....and made my hatred for Bud Adams even more intense.

TexanJedi
02-02-2009, 10:26 AM
Bud. Adams. Is. Evil.:mad:

painekiller
02-02-2009, 12:34 PM
I stopped caring about them in 1995.

HPF Bob
02-02-2009, 04:20 PM
This doesn't bother me so long as the Chiefs are wearing Dallas Texans uniforms.

Nconroe
02-02-2009, 09:05 PM
I guess Lamar Hunt and then Bud Adams more or less started the AFL, so, there were some early good memories. definitely quit caring in early 90s and 95.

painekiller
02-02-2009, 10:02 PM
Yes Bud and Lamar together used to pay every player in the league. Not many people realize that, but the AFL would not have survived had Bud not been willing to help the other teams out.

Lamar is in the HOF, and Bud is not. As much as it pains me, Bud does deserve to be in the HOF along with Lamar.

papabear
02-03-2009, 12:49 PM
Lamar is in the HOF, and Bud is not. As much as it pains me, Bud does deserve to be in the HOF along with Lamar.

As strong as my hate is toward Bud Adams I agree that he should be in the hall...not being an asshole is not a requirement for entry. I'm sure there are plenty of other asshole backstabbers in the Hall he could hang out with...maybe they could even open a new wing. He has played a very important role in the history of the league though.

Fonz the Boss
02-03-2009, 08:31 PM
I dont really care about them anymore.... The Jets also wear their New York Titans uniform... that evens it out.

NBT
02-04-2009, 01:29 PM
The 0nly Hall Bud Adams belongs in is a pool hall.

superbowlbound
02-11-2009, 10:36 PM
I want to pee in Bud Adams' flowerbed

Keith
04-15-2009, 02:12 PM
OOOWwwwowwowwwww!!! MY eyes!! my eyes!!!1!!!

http://www.titansonline.com/assets/images/community/vandenbosch_uniform_275.jpg

HPF Bob
04-15-2009, 04:14 PM
That's what the original uniforms looked like back in their AFL Championship days. I've always thought the numerals looked weird but that's how they looked.

http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com/nfl/tenhou/houoilerspics.html

Check out the jersies of the 1960 Championship team on the left.

Keith
05-15-2009, 08:55 PM
OOOWwwwowwowwwww!!! MY eyes!! my eyes!!!1!!!

Not for the faint of heart:
http://www.nflshop.com/largeImage/index.jsp?LargeImageURL=http%3A//nfl.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/p5849223dt.jpg

HPF Bob
05-15-2009, 09:14 PM
Meh...it's history.

Think that's bad? Imagine being the Broncos and having to don again those San Diego Padres' brown-and-mustard color combination unis with vertical socks.

as shown here. (http://thefulleffect.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/denver60oj7.gif)

And here's a rare color photo of an Oilers at Broncos game from 1960 or 1961:

http://endzonesportscharities.org/60h_act.jpg

Keith
05-15-2009, 10:33 PM
Imagine being the Broncos and having to don again those San Diego Padres' brown-and-mustard color combination unis with vertical socks.

as shown here. (http://thefulleffect.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/denver60oj7.gif)

Actually, I think that looks pretty cool. I mean, this is football, not a beauty contest, and those colors are just football to me.

Yeah, the Oilers are history, but damn if it isn't MY history.

NBT
05-16-2009, 03:11 PM
That's the point with me! I do go back to the very beginning, with Adams signing Billy Cannon under the Sugar Bowl goalpost in 1958! I don't care if he did help fund the AFL, he screwed over this city big time for a long time. I don't forget and I sure as hell don't forgive.

painekiller
05-16-2009, 11:12 PM
That's the point with me! I do go back to the very beginning, with Adams signing Billy Cannon under the Sugar Bowl goalpost in 1958! I don't care if he did help fund the AFL, he screwed over this city big time for a long time. I don't forget and I sure as hell don't forgive.

Amen!

And that uniform is the uniform of Earl Campbell, Bum Phillips and Luv a Blue. And it is the uniform of Run N Shoot, House of Pain, 35-3. It is my cities sports history, and that man stole it.

As a fan I was told we do not matter, and that we where bad fans by the former commissioner. The league did everything it could to bypass the Houston fans. Well screw that man.

Dave
05-21-2009, 02:19 PM
Actually, I think that looks pretty cool. I mean, this is football, not a beauty contest, and those colors are just football to me.

Yeah, the Oilers are history, but damn if it isn't MY history.

VERTICALLY striped socks?! My understanding is that, among the players, those atrocities rank right up there with the NHL's California Golden Seals white skates for pure seething hatred. I heard that they all got together and burned the socks when they changed uniforms. Awful.

HPF Bob
05-21-2009, 03:49 PM
VERTICALLY striped socks?! My understanding is that, among the players, those atrocities rank right up there with the NHL's California Golden Seals white skates for pure seething hatred. I heard that they all got together and burned the socks when they changed uniforms. Awful.

That's a bit overstated. The Broncos switched head coaches for 1962 and the new coach decided he needed to jettison the Broncos' colors as well as their attitude so he had the old unis burned during training camp as a motivational ploy. True, the socks were not popular but the burning wasn't just for the socks - it was for the whole ugly-assed ensemble which had been purchased on the cheap from a defunct college bowl game (The Copper Bowl in Tucson, AZ).

Warren
05-22-2009, 07:35 AM
Yeah, the Oilers are history, but damn if it isn't MY history.Me too. As for team history, name, uniforms, etc., I still think the NFL should handle all franchise relocations like it did when the Browns moved to Baltimore and became the Ravens -- that stuff stays in the old city, and the franchise is treated like an expansion franchise in the new city. I would think the new city would prefer it that way as well -- remember the minor uproar in Tennessee when Bud started backtracking from his promise to rename the Oilers after the move? If the old city got a new team, it would have the option of adopting the old name.

papabear
05-22-2009, 08:48 AM
Me too. As for team history, name, uniforms, etc., I still think the NFL should handle all franchise relocations like it did when the Browns moved to Baltimore and became the Ravens -- that stuff stays in the old city, and the franchise is treated like an expansion franchise in the new city. I would think the new city would prefer it that way as well -- remember the minor uproar in Tennessee when Bud started backtracking from his promise to rename the Oilers after the move? If the old city got a new team, it would have the option of adopting the old name.

I agree one hundred percent The name/unis should stay with the original city, but the owner, and not the NFL, are the ones who own the rights to that "property", correct?

I seem to remember hearing that McNair tried to buy the Oilers name from Mephistopheles, but he wouldn't sell.

p.s. I find it depressing that Firefox spell check flags "Oilers"

painekiller
05-22-2009, 08:52 AM
Me too. As for team history, name, uniforms, etc., I still think the NFL should handle all franchise relocation's like it did when the Browns moved to Baltimore and became the Ravens -- that stuff stays in the old city, and the franchise is treated like an expansion franchise in the new city. I would think the new city would prefer it that way as well -- remember the minor uproar in Tennessee when Bud started backtracking from his promise to rename the Oilers after the move? If the old city got a new team, it would have the option of adopting the old name.

I agree with you on this, but the league has only gone to that extreme once. The Colts still claim Johnny U, he does not belong to Baltimore. The Cardinals have been in 3 different cities. The KC Chiefs where originally the Texans from Dallas. The team owned the name, not the city, except in Green Bay.

The commissioner did not really have the right to take Modell's history, but Modell allowed the city and the league the right to the name out of guilt. Bud just gave us the finger, guess he was listening all those years when we where cursing him.

HPF Bob
05-22-2009, 03:56 PM
p.s. I find it depressing that Firefox spell check flags "Oilers"

It spell check flags "Astros" as well.

Warren
05-23-2009, 03:46 PM
I agree one hundred percent The name/unis should stay with the original city, but the owner, and not the NFL, are the ones who own the rights to that "property", correct?I'm pretty sure that is the case, although I know the NFL has certain merchandising rights (through NFL Properties) and approval rights over uniforms and logos.

I'm not holding my breath that the owners would vote to limit their own rights, and they probably wouldn't want to even suggest that the cities/fans have even a symbolic right to part of the teams.

I agree with you on this, but the league has only gone to that extreme once. The Colts still claim Johnny U, he does not belong to Baltimore. The Cardinals have been in 3 different cities. The KC Chiefs where originally the Texans from Dallas. The team owned the name, not the city, except in Green BayAnd the Rams have been in three cities (Cleveland, LA, and St. Louis) and Chargers in two (LA and San Diego).

painekiller
05-25-2009, 09:30 AM
And the Rams have been in three cities (Cleveland, LA, and St. Louis).

I had forgotten the Cleveland Rams, that was how they got the Browns, might of had a lot to do with the exception given to the fans about the history staying with the city.

popanot
05-27-2009, 06:43 AM
People who love football know that Earl, Bum, Kenny, Dan and Billy were Houston Oilers. They know it was the Houston Oilers who cratered like little school girls in Buffalo. And they know it was the Houston Oilers when Buddy Ryan tried to sucker punch Gilbride on national TV. While I was upset at first that Bum took the name and history with him - and that the NFL let him do it, I'm okay with it now and find starting with a clean slate refreshing. For me it would have been harder to digest the first few years of this franchise had all the Oiler baggage came along with it. Now if only we could get competetive on a consistent basis and build some good Houston Texans history...

NBT
05-28-2009, 02:08 PM
The "Oilers" were in, and part of, Houston for 30 something years. They wandered around Tennessee for maybe 3. And that gives them the right to flaunt the Oilers uniform in front of us? B.S.:mad:

Warren
08-10-2009, 06:53 PM
It was weird seeing those uniforms last night, especially with "Houston Oilers" on the sideline gear. Will the Chiefs be wearing Dallas Texans uniforms at some point this season?

Speaking of the Oilers, I saw that free agent OT Jon Runyan is expected to be cleared to begin playing again after knee surgery. Unless I'm overlooking somebody, when he's gone there will be no former Houston Oilers playing in the NFL.

Keith
08-10-2009, 07:59 PM
I'm finally watching this now, and yeah, it's a bit surreal. I keep having flashbacks. And it isn't helping when I see Oilers head coach Jeff Fisher on the sideline.