1st Round DL

[Roy P]

I've seen some discussions about taking or not taking a DL with our 1st round pick. So much so, I felt it deserved it's own thread.

First up for debate is B.J. Raji as the much needed NT to anchor the DL. While it may be a moot point and he could be drafted before we pick, why not kick this can around? A reason not to could include the fact that Vince Wilfork was not drafted until #21, so perhaps #15 is too high. Also, one could assume that Raji would most likely only be a two down DL that would need to be replaced several times during a game to keep fresh. What is his mind like and can he learn a defensive scheme. The last reason, which would apply to any DL is that we've spent 1st round picks on the DL before.

The reasons to select Raji include the fact that he is a force in the middle. He commands double teams and they still have trouble stopping him from moving the pile back 3 yards in the backfield. Imagine DeMeco being able to roam freely to the RB instead of having to take on RGs. Okoye would also be allowed to use his penetrating ability as the 3-Technique and be disruptive. Peyton Manning would no longer be able to step up in the pocket when Mario Williams comes screaming around his left ear hole. The defense would not have to blitz in order to get pressure on the QB. We might be able to shut down the run against the Titans and Jags without needing 9 in the box. Even if the big fella has to come out on 3rd down, that wouldn't be so bad if it was 3rd and 7 because we were able to stop teams on the 1st two downs. There is no other player who compares to Raji and what he can do on a football field in this draft class.

Exhibit #2 is Peria Jerry. Don't laugh, this guy is very good. The main reason we shouldn't draft him is because Travis Johnson and Amobi Okoye are very similar to him. He's a one-gap penetrator and can play on the offense's side of the ball. However, with Okoye on the roster, it seems a little bit of a missed opportunity. Perhaps we could get someone similar later in the draft, (Sen'Derrick Marks, Ziggy Hood, Alex Magee, or Darryl Richard) if we are simply trying to find another TJ or Okoye backup.

Exhibit #3 is Brian Orakpo/Everette Brown/Aaron Maybin. Yep, I lump them all together because to me they are all the same type of player. The main reason against these guys is that they are small when you consider putting their hand on the ground to play DE for 3 downs. While there are guys like T. Suggs and D. Freeney (not to mention Aaron Schobel and Chris Kelsay), they are not very effective vs. the run. So, basically you are allocating resources (1st round pick money) to be successful on defensive 3rd and longs - something you should be successful at anyway. I'd rather have a DE who plays against the run such as Robert Ayers and bring in a pass-rush specialist like Stryker Sulak who will be available much later in the draft.

[James]

What about grabbing a pass-rusher in the 1st round and Ron Brace or Ziggy Hood (granted, not likely) in the 2nd round. It's more likely now that Raji will be off the board, in fact, I could see him as high as #8 with the Jags. If thats the scenario then we will have to look away from DT, as there is not another that fits the NT mold in the fifteenth slot. Brace will clog up the run and free up Okoye, Mario, and the (hopefully) elite pass-rusher with his required double teams, I think this is a great 2 round strategy for the Texans to take.

[jppaul]

What about grabbing a pass-rusher in the 1st round and Ron Brace or Ziggy Hood (granted, not likely) in the 2nd round. It's more likely now that Raji will be off the board, in fact, I could see him as high as #8 with the Jags. If thats the scenario then we will have to look away from DT, as there is not another that fits the NT mold in the fifteenth slot. Brace will clog up the run and free up Okoye, Mario, and the (hopefully) elite pass-rusher with his required double teams, I think this is a great 2 round strategy for the Texans to take.

I've said my piece on this subject. I vote no.

[James]

What's your pick at 15 then jppaul? A speedster like Maclin or Harvin for the offense? A tackle? Or the secondary?

[nunusguy]

It's more likely now that Raji will be off the board, in fact, I could see him as high as #8 with the Jags.
I dunno, but I could see him going even higher. And as Roy pointed out,
this guy is the second coming of Vince Wolfork, which makes him even more attractive in the Draft because he could play nose in the 3-4 but also still play ANY inside position in the 4-3 IMO. In other words the guy is not only a fabulous talent but he's also very versatitle so even more teams will be licking their 'chops as they eye him on the Board. I'll even go out on the limb here and predict this is the first player that a team drafts thru a trade, i.e.,
somebody is gonna want him so bad they will be the first team to move up in the Draft by way of a trade. Could it be the Texans ? Probably not, but no way we'd know before it would happen because Smith/Kubiak play their cards so close to the vest.

[jppaul]

What's your pick at 15 then jppaul? A speedster like Maclin or Harvin for the offense? A tackle? Or the secondary?

I unfortunately have no great alternative. I like Cushing at SLB, Malulaga, althlough that presents some problems, Beanie Wells for a 1-2 punch, though we seem able to find talent later in the draft. I like Alphonso Smith, but its a bit early for him. I would likely go Cushing. I am disappointed that so many juniors elected to stay.

If he had come out Mays, had he fallen would have been my pick. I unfortunately think that we are going to be in a position where DL is going to be the best value. I think either Orakpo or Maybin will likely be on the board, and if I was forced to choose I would say Maybin, though I am a fan of Orakpos too.

At this point I am crossing my fingers for a trade down and a willing partner. Naturally, if we lose D-rob my priorities would shift and I would have to look at Vontae Davis or Alphonso Smith at 15.

[James]

When opportunity presented itself to our secondary (J. Reeves vs Vikings) they made plays . . .I think the front 7 is more crucial to a defense than a secondary, I think the front 7 makes the secondary. Would Ed Reed or Troy Polamalu be as dominant without the pressure up front? The short answer is no. Why wouldn't we push to make our DLine the best on the planet, we already have a couple of pieces (granted Amobe is a work in progress) that can lead our secondary to become average, at the very least, and exceptional if we play our cards right. This is why I advocate a DLine selection, hopefully, Raji, if not, then a speed rusher like Maybin, Brown, or Orakpo . . .if available.

[kRocket]

I have been watching the workouts this week and it looks like Mayock believes Robert Ayers has risen into the first round. He knew before hand that he was good against the run, but he has shown a lot running the arc and the inside rush also. He had at least one sack in the Game IIRC doing that very thing. We need a DE and he appears to be one we could use.

[barrett]

I unfortunately have no great alternative. I like Cushing at SLB, Malulaga, althlough that presents some problems, Beanie Wells for a 1-2 punch, though we seem able to find talent later in the draft. I like Alphonso Smith, but its a bit early for him. I would likely go Cushing. I am disappointed that so many juniors elected to stay.

If he had come out Mays, had he fallen would have been my pick. I unfortunately think that we are going to be in a position where DL is going to be the best value. I think either Orakpo or Maybin will likely be on the board, and if I was forced to choose I would say Maybin, though I am a fan of Orakpos too.

At this point I am crossing my fingers for a trade down and a willing partner. Naturally, if we lose D-rob my priorities would shift and I would have to look at Vontae Davis or Alphonso Smith at 15.

I agree with everything you are typing here and I think it is why DL is in play. There simply are not many other good options/values.

There is no position on offense I would go with in round 1. RB is our only need there, but you don't draft a backup RB in round 1 even if he is going to share time. I think a bigger back can be had round 3 or later.

FS would be a great pick but with Mays gone I don't know if any warrants the #15 pick.

SLB is the most useless and low impact position on a defense. They are 2 down players who make very few plays.

A WLB or a MLB that would move Demeco is slightly more valuable than a sam, but it is a huge price both financially and asset-wise to pay for a 4-3 OLB. The OLB is just not a huge position in the 4-3.

If Dunta is gone than I think it almost automatically becomes a CB unless there is a run of them off the board before us.

DT does not make that much sense to me since we have 3 decent young guys in Okoye, TJ, and Robinson. I understand some picking up a bigger type to clog the middle and would be ok with it, but don't think it is a huge key. Honestly our LBs stayed pretty clean this year. The bigger problem of the DTs was penetration and we are supposed to have that guy already in Okoye. Replacing him won't happen yet because he was a pick of this staff.

That leaves DE. Mario is the only DE we have drafted and he worked out great. But like Roy P, I would rather see a 2 down player from either Buhlman or a low draft pick, and then couple them with a pass rush specialist who is middle round because of his size. I don't think it has to be a 1st round pick.

So who do I want? Honestly I would love to trade down, because I simply don't see the value and need meeting up for us at #15. If we could drop out of the first round altogether or drop down twice even better. If we end up with a pair of 2s and pair of 3s we can get all of the things we are looking for (big RB, FS, DE, Josh Freeman to develop as a QB to replace Sage).

If we get stuck at #15, then BPA out of the FS, DT, DE (or CB if Dunta is gone).

[jppaul]

I agree with everything you are typing here and I think it is why DL is in play. There simply are not many other good options/values.

There is no position on offense I would go with in round 1. RB is our only need there, but you don't draft a backup RB in round 1 even if he is going to share time. I think a bigger back can be had round 3 or later.

FS would be a great pick but with Mays gone I don't know if any warrants the #15 pick.

SLB is the most useless and low impact position on a defense. They are 2 down players who make very few plays.

A WLB or a MLB that would move Demeco is slightly more valuable than a sam, but it is a huge price both financially and asset-wise to pay for a 4-3 OLB. The OLB is just not a huge position in the 4-3.

If Dunta is gone than I think it almost automatically becomes a CB unless there is a run of them off the board before us.

DT does not make that much sense to me since we have 3 decent young guys in Okoye, TJ, and Robinson. I understand some picking up a bigger type to clog the middle and would be ok with it, but don't think it is a huge key. Honestly our LBs stayed pretty clean this year. The bigger problem of the DTs was penetration and we are supposed to have that guy already in Okoye. Replacing him won't happen yet because he was a pick of this staff.

That leaves DE. Mario is the only DE we have drafted and he worked out great. But like Roy P, I would rather see a 2 down player from either Buhlman or a low draft pick, and then couple them with a pass rush specialist who is middle round because of his size. I don't think it has to be a 1st round pick.

So who do I want? Honestly I would love to trade down, because I simply don't see the value and need meeting up for us at #15. If we could drop out of the first round altogether or drop down twice even better. If we end up with a pair of 2s and pair of 3s we can get all of the things we are looking for (big RB, FS, DE, Josh Freeman to develop as a QB to replace Sage).

If we get stuck at #15, then BPA out of the FS, DT, DE (or CB if Dunta is gone).

Despite my misgivings, I think your right, that is probably how its gonna shakeout.

[Bigtinylittle]

I agree with everything you are typing here and I think it is why DL is in play. There simply are not many other good options/values.

There is no position on offense I would go with in round 1. RB is our only need there, but you don't draft a backup RB in round 1 even if he is going to share time. I think a bigger back can be had round 3 or later.

FS would be a great pick but with Mays gone I don't know if any warrants the #15 pick.

SLB is the most useless and low impact position on a defense. They are 2 down players who make very few plays.

A WLB or a MLB that would move Demeco is slightly more valuable than a sam, but it is a huge price both financially and asset-wise to pay for a 4-3 OLB. The OLB is just not a huge position in the 4-3.

If Dunta is gone than I think it almost automatically becomes a CB unless there is a run of them off the board before us.

DT does not make that much sense to me since we have 3 decent young guys in Okoye, TJ, and Robinson. I understand some picking up a bigger type to clog the middle and would be ok with it, but don't think it is a huge key. Honestly our LBs stayed pretty clean this year. The bigger problem of the DTs was penetration and we are supposed to have that guy already in Okoye. Replacing him won't happen yet because he was a pick of this staff.

That leaves DE. Mario is the only DE we have drafted and he worked out great. But like Roy P, I would rather see a 2 down player from either Buhlman or a low draft pick, and then couple them with a pass rush specialist who is middle round because of his size. I don't think it has to be a 1st round pick.

So who do I want? Honestly I would love to trade down, because I simply don't see the value and need meeting up for us at #15. If we could drop out of the first round altogether or drop down twice even better. If we end up with a pair of 2s and pair of 3s we can get all of the things we are looking for (big RB, FS, DE, Josh Freeman to develop as a QB to replace Sage).

If we get stuck at #15, then BPA out of the FS, DT, DE (or CB if Dunta is gone).

In order to figure out who the Texans WILL draft, instead of who we as fans would select, I think it is important to try to get inside Smith's and Kubiak's heads. That's a pretty hard thing to do because of how close to the vest they play their cards. That said, here's what I think: I think Kubiak is relatively pleased with last year's safety play.

I know a lot of fans in Houston want a true-old-style-roaming-speed- burning free safety, but that's not the style of safety Kubes covets. I'm not saying he wouldn't play one if he fell into our hands, but I just can't see Kubuak giving up a top draft choice to get one of those guys. On the other hand, if a tremendous SS fell to us in the second round, one who was an exceptional tackler and also good in coverage, I guess the Texans might take him. But I don't see anyone like that on the horizon. So I personally see us going with our two older veterans backed up by Harrison and Barber. Demps may get cut, but if he doesn't, that would create such a log jam at safety that I just don't see us going for a safety even in a lower round.

I'm thinking the most likely for our first pick is a run stuffing tackle as a rotation guy, or a DE who would allow us to cut Weaver and his huge salary. I could also see up going for a LB if the coaches fall in love with one. I could even see us going for Moreno if the coaches are in love with him. If we go with a DE in the first, I could see us going for another one in a lower round. The roster right now isn't exactly full of talented DEs.

[barrett]

In order to figure out who the Texans WILL draft, instead of who we as fans would select, I think it is important to try to get inside Smith's and Kubiak's heads. That's a pretty hard thing to do because of how close to the vest they play their cards. That said, here's what I think: I think Kubiak is relatively pleased with last year's safety play.

I know a lot of fans in Houston want a true-old-style-roaming-speed- burning free safety, but that's not the style of safety Kubes covets. I'm not saying he wouldn't play one if he fell into our hands, but I just can't see Kubuak giving up a top draft choice to get one of those guys. On the other hand, if a tremendous SS fell to us in the second round, one who was an exceptional tackler and also good in coverage, I guess the Texans might take him. But I don't see anyone like that on the horizon. So I personally see us going with our two older veterans backed up by Harrison and Barber. Demps may get cut, but if he doesn't, that would create such a log jam at safety that I just don't see us going for a safety even in a lower round.

I'm thinking the most likely for our first pick is a run stuffing tackle as a rotation guy, or a DE who would allow us to cut Weaver and his huge salary. I could also see up going for a LB if the coaches fall in love with one. I could even see us going for Moreno if the coaches are in love with him. If we go with a DE in the first, I could see us going for another one in a lower round. The roster right now isn't exactly full of talented DEs.

What makes you think this is what's in Kubiak's head? What would indicate Kubiak does not covet this kind of safety?

First off Kubiak has not run our defense the last 3 years so I don't think it's about what Kubiak covets. Second, a new DC means changes in defensive scheme and different uses of personnel. If Bush wants to play the DL upfield more like he talked about it may mean we play more man with our CBs. Or it may not. It may mean we blitz our safeties and LBs more or it may not. It may mean we continue playing the ridiculous "we don'thave a FS, we have two interchangable Safeties (who can't cover) defense." Or again, we may not.

My point is that we don't know exactly how personnel will be used under Bush other than we will run a 4-3 front and it won't be cover 2. Outside of that he has stated only an intension to be more aggressive (like every new DC).

Now it doesn't look like a FS worth the slot will be available at 15, so my guess is DL or a tradedown (I hope for tradedown). But we certainly can't go eliminating positions based on the tendencies of a defense under a new coordinator we have never seen in that role.

[Bigtinylittle]

I can agree it's too early to definately eliminate positions, especially since trades, cuts, and free agent signings could change the roster before the draft.

An interesting comment Lance Zurlein made on his blog this week is that the league is moving toward interchangable safeties. I don't have the exact quote but it can't be hard to find.

By the way, I'm not saying I'm personally against drafting a superstar safety. I'm pretty much in favor of us adding a superstar at just about any position. I think without a doubt our greatest need right now is at DE, but not to the point of reaching for one.

If we go for a safety in the second or third round, or if we trade down in the first and take one, I won't automatically be opposed to it. I AM opposed to taking one at 15 though. I just don't see one good enough to take that early.

[nunusguy]

The relative importance of safeties & corners in the Texans DBackfield is obviously going to be a function of the philosophy for the defense crafted from the Bush-Kollar alliance. If the Texans continue to emphasize man coverage with their CBs it seems unlikely that if they'd go DBackfield in the first round they'd draft a safety instead of a CB, even if D-Rob is retained.
I dunno that the Texans have done anything real surprising or unpredictible in the Draft since the big Mario pick of 2006, but this Draft has a different feel to me. I could see them really pulling a shocker in the first round if somebody they rated very high (say top 5 or so) is on the Board at 15 even if its a low-need position. Say for example the Texans have Jeremy McClain rated even higher than Crabtree at WR (he's faster than the TT guy and is also a kick/punt returner), and he's on the Board ?

[papabear]

I'm not against taking a D-lineman in the first, but it's also not my first choice. I think if we are going to go for a DT then it needs to be someone like Raji who is expected to be able to play more of 2gap space eating type of tackle. The problem with that is that I don't think the chances of any rookie DT being able to step in and dominate for 16 games (DT's need to grow into that position) so I doubt we would see the full benefit of Raji next year (that shouldn't be a reason not to pick him though).

If we're talking ends then I think we need a speed rush type guy who FLIES off the ball. The problem is most of those guys aren't very good against the run. So we are either using a first round pick on a specialist, or giving up a little in the run stopping department. I'm sure there are plenty of guys quick enough to be the speed rusher who are adequate against the run....there just very hard to find. With Mario at the other end and a hopefully improved interior we should be able to work around it, but if all we need is a specialist there should be a fast undersized DE later in the draft who could fill that role.

I would like upgrade our LB's too, but I think the most logical upgrade would be at SAM. Again, I'm not sure I want to use a first rounder on a guy who likely won't be a three down player. Demeco could be moved over to the WILL, but that puts another promising young player on the sidelines...so that new MLB better be pretty darn good.

I don't see CB because of Bennet, Molden, Reeves, and Dunta (assuming he comes back). I know most people would like to see Reeves gone, but even if that happened it would still be tough for them to get on the field even if you assume they beat out Molden.

Safety to me is the obvious choice based on needs, but I'm not sure if there are any there that are worthy. I am completely off of the Moore bandwagon. I wouldn't be upset if we took him, but it's not something I'm rooting for anymore.

I think you need to take a look at every player available when your turn comes up in the first round. It's hard enough to get 10 guys to agree on who the best is at position x....it's even harder to get everyone to agree on who is the best when comparing two guys at vastly different positions. That's where need should be the tiebreaker. I don't think we need anything other than better depth and a compliment to Slaton on offense, so I hope we get another difference maker on defense somewhere in the draft.

[Roy P]

Say for example the Texans have Jeremy McClain rated even higher than Crabtree at WR (he's faster than the TT guy and is also a kick/punt returner), and he's on the Board ?

IF Jeremy Maclin is on the board and we DON'T draft him, then we'll know that the Texans are not using the BPA philosophy.

[barrett]

IF Jeremy Maclin is on the board and we DON'T draft him, then we'll know that the Texans are not using the BPA philosophy.

can maclin return punts as well as kicks? Or can he at least catch them? If so he saves us a few TOs a year.

Also my memory is a little fuzzy on how often we lined up Walter in the slot this year. I remember Anderson there on lots of 3 and 4 WR sets, but seem to remember Walter almost exclusively on the outside. AJ was also in the slot a some, but I wouldn't want him there all the time.

The reason I ask is just curiosity about how we fit the three together, because I feel like Walter was very effective as a deep threat, ran great routes, and was a fantastic blocker. If I am going to have 3 good WRs I want one to be a true slot guy and I don't think any of those three are. Additionally I don't know that Maclin helps us in the red zone which is the only place our offense struggled. I might prefer a TE who could work the middle of the field and could help on the goal line. Do any TEs fit this bill?

[mussop]

can maclin return punts as well as kicks? Or can he at least catch them? If so he saves us a few TOs a year.

Also my memory is a little fuzzy on how often we lined up Walter in the slot this year. I remember Anderson there on lots of 3 and 4 WR sets, but seem to remember Walter almost exclusively on the outside. AJ was also in the slot a some, but I wouldn't want him there all the time.

The reason I ask is just curiosity about how we fit the three together, because I feel like Walter was very effective as a deep threat, ran great routes, and was a fantastic blocker. If I am going to have 3 good WRs I want one to be a true slot guy and I don't think any of those three are. Additionally I don't know that Maclin helps us in the red zone which is the only place our offense struggled. I might prefer a TE who could work the middle of the field and could help on the goal line. Do any TEs fit this bill?

Brandon Pettigrew TE Oklahoma State

[barrett]

Brandon Pettigrew TE Oklahoma State

He was my first thought and I actually typed his name at first, but I think I remember the announcers talking in their bowl game about how he had ZERO touchdowns this year. Maybe it was just a case of forcing it to Dez Bryant near the goalline or something, but either way I have a hard time drafting a TE #15 who did not catch a TD pass his senior year. Especially when any TE we draft would need to be a big time red zone target.

Did anyone watch enough OkSU games to give a little insight here?

[Roy P]

can maclin return punts as well as kicks? Or can he at least catch them? If so he saves us a few TOs a year.

Additionally I don't know that Maclin helps us in the red zone which is the only place our offense struggled. I might prefer a TE who could work the middle of the field and could help on the goal line. Do any TEs fit this bill?

JMac is the combo of Devin Hester and Torry Holt. He's a homerun threat anytime he touches the ball. If Walter could put up numbers in this offense, JMac would make defenses think twice before double covering AJ.

If you want a TE, Bear Pascoe is your guy and we don't have to spend #15 to get him.

[barrett]

JMac is the combo of Devin Hester and Torry Holt. He's a homerun threat anytime he touches the ball. If Walter could put up numbers in this offense, JMac would make defenses think twice before double covering AJ.

If you want a TE, Bear Pascoe is your guy and we don't have to spend #15 to get him.

I don't necessarily want a TE, I just think a TE helps this offense more than a Deep threat WR. We have no problem moving the ball between the 20s (what guys like Hester and Holt do). We do it as well as anyone in the NFL. We need someone who helps us in the red zone and Maclin does not have the size to do that.

Not to mention Walter had more TDs then Hester and Holt combined.

[Roy P]

Not to mention Walter had more TDs then Hester and Holt combined.

So, I suppose you wouldn't want to trade Walter for Steve Smith, either. Smitty only had 6 TDs compared to Walter's 8. It's amazing Walter didn't make the Pro-Bowl.

While I concede that the offense did a good job moving the ball, and had difficulty in the red zone, they are not above adding a playmaker with the #15 pick. Ideally, it would be nice to have a player like Ed Reed sitting there for us on draft day, but it is not likely to happen in this draft. Therefore, it is important to get the best available player who is most likely to have a successful career for the Texans and make a pretty immediate impact.

The latest Drafttek simulator has the Jaguars selecting JMac at #8. That's the last thing I'd hope for. There is nobody in our Secondary who can cover him. I suppose we might be inclined to select D.J. Moore or Alphonso Smith to play CB if that were the case. Then we had better hope that we could fill even more needs later.

[nunusguy]

The latest Drafttek simulator has the Jaguars selecting JMac at #8. That's the last thing I'd hope for. There is nobody in our Secondary who can cover him.

You're probably right Roy. That's why we need another stud edge-rusher at the other DE to help Mario knock Garrard on his azz before he can throw the ball downfield.

[James]

I'm not sure how enamored with Raji the rest of you are, but at this point, he is my #1 target in round one, lets say he slips out of the top 10 for some odd reason, maybe there's a run on the OT's and 4 go in the top 10. Would you swap spots with Buffalo for a 3rd? Think they would do it considering they could probably still get their man at 15 if it is indeed Pettigrew or an edge rusher? Or do we stick with Deljuan and Okoye, stay at 15 and grab an edge rusher?

[TexanJedi]

I'm not sure how enamored with Raji the rest of you are, but at this point, he is my #1 target in round one, lets say he slips out of the top 10 for some odd reason, maybe there's a run on the OT's and 4 go in the top 10. Would you swap spots with Buffalo for a 3rd? Think they would do it considering they could probably still get their man at 15 if it is indeed Pettigrew or an edge rusher? Or do we stick with Deljuan and Okoye, stay at 15 and grab an edge rusher?

I vote option 2. Raji's nice, but Perry will be there if the Texans are set on a tackle. He's not as highly rated as Raji, but I would be hesitant to trade up for anyone at this point. Check back in a couple of months and maybe I change my mind. I do think as fans of the draft we become a little stingy when it comes to our team trading picks since after following the process we get enamored with certain players and always want more picks for our team to draft them. However, if a team is convinced that a player is the guy they want and need then they have to do what they can, in reason, to get him.

[James]

Jerry and Raji are very different players. Jerry is a 3 technique one gap tackle, whereas Raji is a 2 gap run stuffer. That is why I am so enamored with the guy, because he is different than any other DT in the draft, if we want another 3 technique, I think we can trade down from 15 and grab Moala or Hood, but Raji fills a need that we haven't been able to fill since Walker/Payne were here.

[danger6]

I wonder what type of defensive tackle the new coordinator and d-line coach might want. That will probably be a secret until after the draft.

[mussop]

Jerry and Raji are very different players. Jerry is a 3 technique one gap tackle, whereas Raji is a 2 gap run stuffer. That is why I am so enamored with the guy, because he is different than any other DT in the draft, if we want another 3 technique, I think we can trade down from 15 and grab Moala or Hood, but Raji fills a need that we haven't been able to fill since Walker/Payne were here.

actually Raji is both. He can do either which is why I think it would be insane to pass him up at 15 should he fall.

[James]

True, which is why I would advocate us moving up for the man.

[Roy P]

While I like what Raji can do, I'm not 100% sure of what he will do once he has guaranteed money in his bank account. During the Senior Bowl practices he looked like Shaun Rogers. On Tuesday he was good, on Wednesday he was there, then on Thursday after Mayock got on him the day before he was great. If you watched the game on Saturday, there were plays where he was pretty average. While I've never heard him talk, his body language is somewhat disappointing. Is this a guy who has to have a boot in his ass in order to perform? What motivates him to perform to his highest ability is something that our team is going to have to determine before it thinks about using its #15 pick, much less mortgaging the future with extra picks to move up to get him.

None of us will be in the room when Raji is interviewed. We will not know how he will explain his academic problems at BC. Hopefully, we'll get to see what he scores on the Wunderlich to determine a little insight into his mental capacity. However, even that isn't proof positive if he'll be a risky pick to play NT in the NFL or not. We can only hope that coach Kollar and coach Bush will be able to get a feel for how lazy Raji is or is not and how dedicated he will be at the Pro level. If we draft him, we'll have to hope that the staff has done their homework.

If Raji didn't have unique skills at a position of need for us, we might not be willing to take the risk. Perhaps we would look for a player who has a better probability of making an impact for the team. I would guess that Peria Jerry has a better work ethic based upon how I saw him play consistently when he was on the field. His "downside" is the fact that most people see him as a player who would fill the same need as Amobi Okoye and would we see his strengths utilized if he was asked to simply stop the run and hold the point of attack. Perhaps Jerry's ability would keep OLs off guard not knowing which DT would attack and which would have the "stop the run" responsibility on any given down. This is a similar aproach of keeping the offense guessing which LB or which S is going to Blitz. Something to keep in mind.